Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-05-06 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-05-06 House Journal Page 4496 SB 136 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the May 5, 1996, calendar (page 4431), and which had been moved down the calendar to follow CSSB 216(FIN)(title am) (page 4474), was read the third time: HOUSE CS FOR 2D CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 136(FIN) am H An Act making, amending, and repealing appropriations; making an appropriation under art. IX, sec. 17(c), Constitution of the State of Alaska, from the constitutional budget reserve fund; and providing for an effective date. Representative Hanley moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 24. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 24 was offered by Representative Hanley: Add new sections to read: * Sec. __. The sum of $250,000 is reappropriated from the Power Project Fund otherwise subject to lapse into the general fund as of June 30 and August 10, 1994, in accordance with the former AS 44.83.170(g), to the Office of the Governor for promotion of resource revenues and economic development on the North Slope, including education efforts for opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1997. * Sec. __. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION. The unexpended and unobligated balance of the appropriation, not to exceed $400,000, made in sec. 12, ch. 79, SLA 1993, as amended by sec. 10, ch. 8, FSSLA 1994, and as amended by sec. 96, ch. 103, FSSLA 1995 (research programs for prevention, containment, cleanup, and amelioration of oil spills - $2,950,000) is reappropriated to the Department of Environmental Conservation to develop a marine training program based on simulation which includes pilotage and bridge management training. 1996-05-06 House Journal Page 4497 SB 136 Representative Hanley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 24 be adopted. Representative Brown objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 24 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H Second Reading Amendment No. 24 YEAS: 36 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brown, Finkelstein Absent: Kott, Sanders And so, Amendment No. 24 was adopted. Representative Hanley moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 25. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 25 was offered by Representative Hanley: TO: Amendment No. 9 (page 4421), adopted by the House 5/5/96 In subsection (d) of this amendment: Delete "(a) - (c)" in both places Insert "(a) and (b)" in both places Delete "$550,000" Insert "$525,000" 1996-05-06 House Journal Page 4498 SB 136 Representative Hanley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 25 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Hanley moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 26. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 26 was offered by Representative Hanley: Insert the following: It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities aggressively pursue federal highway funding for authorized projects. If additional state matching funds are needed to preclude the loss of the federal funds or delay of projects into fiscal year 1998, the department is expected to identify this need to the finance committee in 1997 for early funding consideration. Representative Hanley moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 26 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: Shall HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 29 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Robinson 1996-05-06 House Journal Page 4499 SB 136 Absent: Kott, Sanders Kubina changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Elton changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H passed the House. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Vezey moved the budget reserve fund sections. The question being: Shall the budget reserve fund sections be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H Third Reading Budget Reserve Fund YEAS: 25 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kubina, Long, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Absent: Sanders And so, the budget reserve fund sections were not adopted. Representative Kubina gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on HCS 2d CSSB 136(FIN) am H(brf sup maj fld H).